tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8544609315733972726.post94030693759157804..comments2009-12-30T03:03:18.654-07:00Andrew Zhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10108637160465346326noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8544609315733972726.post-87643063285967802232009-12-30T03:03:18.654-07:002009-12-30T03:03:18.654-07:00Can you provide the automation script that you&#39;ve used to measure the performance?אורי קאולhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12327175052254978517noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8544609315733972726.post-38899858497276136212009-02-19T17:30:00.000-07:002009-02-19T17:30:00.000-07:00komik oyun: Michael responded right away. There is a link at the bottom of the page to his blog. Also, I think there was a discussion on the go-oo.org mailing list, but it's been a long time.Andrew Zhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10108637160465346326noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8544609315733972726.post-40720848931840368032009-02-19T15:24:00.000-07:002009-02-19T15:24:00.000-07:00I wonder how long it takes until Michael Meeks responds to this test, whether it be here or on his own blog. I, too, have been a long time reader of Michael Meeks' blog as well as yours.<BR/><BR/>Anyways, I would be curious to see this comparison of performance testing done on Windows for the different OOo versions. I would love to see this if you could pull off this testing on Windows.komik oyunhttp://www.komikoyun.gen.trnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8544609315733972726.post-35035971789160242962008-12-27T08:05:00.000-07:002008-12-27T08:05:00.000-07:00ı have followed your writing for a long time.really you have given very successful information.<BR/>In spite of my english trouale,I am trying to read and understand your writing.<BR/>And ı am following frequently.I hope that you will be with us together with much more scharings.<BR/>I hope that your success will go on.savaş oyunuhttp://www.savasoyunu.netnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8544609315733972726.post-29885695650483138052008-09-30T12:06:00.000-06:002008-09-30T12:06:00.000-06:00It would also have been nice to see StarOffice and Lotus Symphony tested.Davenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8544609315733972726.post-19602360093545365392008-09-30T02:24:00.000-06:002008-09-30T02:24:00.000-06:00Hi Andrew,<BR/><BR/>Interesting write-up ! The fact that the go-oo generic builds do not use the --hash-style=both work, is basically a simple screwup by the packager: which we will fix [ I guess OxygenOffice simply fails to get that wrong, while using the same code ]. If you compared the native SUSE package to the native Fedora package on it's own distro I suspect you would find it a far closer match (and perhaps a fairer comparison :-)<BR/><BR/>As for the provenance of --hash-style=gnu : yes the final implementation was done by Jakub from RedHat [who have a hold on glibc development], but the research, measurement, prototype, and design input were provided by me.<BR/><BR/>Also - I suspect you fail to notice how much of our work has already gone up-stream; Sun have integrated at least a large proportion of our work. I will have to re-do my performance measurements for the go-oo website when 3.0 comes out to see how we do there.<BR/><BR/>Anyhow, was not aware of your work - I love the performance comparison over time paper - that is most interesting: it seems I'm fighting a loosing battle ...<BR/><BR/>HTH,<BR/><BR/>Michael.Michael Meekshttp://www.gnome.org/~michaelnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8544609315733972726.post-87650281363770899502008-09-29T23:54:00.000-06:002008-09-29T23:54:00.000-06:00Would be interested to see how OOo 3.0 compare to 2.4 on this tests.JZAhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01748159292962133596noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8544609315733972726.post-2943392368139575412008-09-29T23:42:00.000-06:002008-09-29T23:42:00.000-06:00go-oo has a nice quickstarter applet.<BR/><BR/>It does not take much memory as well.<BR/><BR/>Have you tried enabling that ? If not, do it, after this, my OO is rocket fast.Sankarhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/13337547916077401549noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8544609315733972726.post-4798999442486769142008-09-29T19:28:00.000-06:002008-09-29T19:28:00.000-06:00I wonder how long it takes until Michael Meeks responds to this test, whether it be here or on his own blog. I, too, have been a long time reader of Michael Meeks' blog as well as yours.<BR/><BR/>Anyways, I would be curious to see this comparison of performance testing done on Windows for the different OOo versions. I would love to see this if you could pull off this testing on Windows.<BR/><BR/>Keep up the great work with your OOo articles.<BR/><BR/>Thanks,<BR/>DaveDavenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8544609315733972726.post-19902036371337095282008-09-29T14:34:00.000-06:002008-09-29T14:34:00.000-06:00Alan: I was surprised. I have been following the development for a while—for example reading the blog of Michael Meeks (a primary Go-oo developers) for a few years. Go-oo advertises performance and has more performance-specific patches. Fedora OOo 2.4.1 only has one performance-specific patch. Also as I mentioned, Go-oo does not use the Hashstyle technology developed by Go-oo hacker Michael Meeks!<BR/><BR/>It&#39;s not feasible to test on all distributions, but one day I would like to repeat the test on Ubuntu.<BR/><BR/>As you point out, you can&#39;t recompile Microsoft Word for Windows, but Windows is more consistent (available .DLLs and their versions, for example), so there is also less need.Andrew Zhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10108637160465346326noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8544609315733972726.post-17618944417102446292008-09-29T13:14:00.000-06:002008-09-29T13:14:00.000-06:00It should hopefully be little surprise that the edition of OOo that was specifically compiled for Fedora works better on Fedora than versions compiled generically. Of course that means little to anyone not using Fedora...<BR/><BR/>Certainly brings to light the value of free licensing when it comes to optimizing performance.alannoreply@blogger.com